• Home
  • Entertainment
  • Crime
  • Sports
  • Celebrity Gossips
  • Across the Globe
  • Business And Money
Top Posts
Yoga sect leader Gregorian Bivolaru and followers arrested...
Ukraine spy chief’s wife poisoned, says Kyiv
Pope Francis cancels COP28 visit over illness
A volcano in Japan spews ash, rock 200m...
Disgraced ex-lawyer Alex Murdaugh sentenced to 27 years...
Elon Musk visits Israel after antisemitism row
Ancient Ukraine treasures returned after court battle
Vermont shooting: Victim jumped the fence to escape...
New Zealand smoking ban: Health experts criticize new...
Imran Khan’s former adviser suffers acid attack in...

  • Home
  • Entertainment
  • Crime
  • Sports
  • Celebrity Gossips
  • Across the Globe
  • Business And Money
0

Kenya’s federal government abolishes 50% property share after divorce, says you take what you brought in

Kenya’s federal government abolishes 50% property share after divorce, says you take what you brought in

The law that allows 50:50 matrimonial property division after divorce has been abolished by Kenya’s Supreme Court.

Following the landmark ruling given by the five-man Supreme Court judges, couples are no longer automatically entitled to a 50 per cent share of property in case of a divorce.

The judges ruled that spouses must prove their contributions to the matrimonial property before they can share in the event of divorce.

This is opposed to the controversial traditional assumption that one was entitled to a 50 per cent share.

Five judges applied the maxim of equality and equity to interpret article 4 of the Constitution on the rights of spouses in marriage.

They decided that equality as contemplated by the law meant that “Contribution towards the acquisition matrimonial properties may not have been done in an equal basis as one party may have significantly contributed to the acquisition of property financially than the other.”

They said;

“A party, though having not contributed more resources while acquiring the property, may have in one way or another, through their actions or their deeds, provided an environment that enabled the other party to have more resources to acquiring the property..”

Consequently, spouses who do not have a direct monetary contribution towards a family’s wealth but help with the roles commonly referred to as household chores could still rightfully demand a share of the wealth.

Their judgment was anchored on various decisions made by courts in other jurisdictions which they used to inform their final ruling. One of the cases cited by the judges is one made by Lord Justice Fox in Burns v Burns in 1984.

The judge had listed roles that would qualify a spouse as one who has contributed to the wealth in question. This includes;

– Contributing to purchase price of the matrimonial property

– Contributing regularly to the monthly payments in the acquisition of such property

– Making a substantial financial contribution to the family expenses so as to enable the mortgage installments to be paid

– Contributing to the running of and welfare of the home and easing the burden of the spouse paying for the property

– Caring for children and the family at large as the other spouse works to earn money to pay for the property

To sum up their resolutions, the judges ruled that implying that matrimonial wealth should be automatically shared at the ratio of 50:50 would bring huge difficulties within marriages.

According to them, such a precedent would encourage some parties to only enter into marriages, comfortably subsist in the marriage without making any monetary or non-monetary contribution, proceed to have the marriage dissolved then wait to be automatically given 50% of the marital property.

An excerpt of the ruling read in part;

“In agreeing with the above decisions, we must note that, in a marriage, the general assumption is that both spouses share everything, and on the face of it, both parties contribute towards the home or family, in one way or another, to whichever extent, however big or small.

“Again, and further to this, both spouses may also work and earn income, which inevitably, in most instances, always ends up being spent on the family unit. It may be the whole income or a substantial part of it, but ultimately, a percentage of it goes into the family.”

The ruling came after a complainant sought invalidation of a ruling made by the country’s Court of Appeal where the court had ordered him to share his property on a 50:50 ratio with his wife back in 2018.

The complainant argued that his wife had not contributed anything towards the acquisition of their house.

Kenya’s federal government abolishes 50% property share after divorce, says you take what you brought in was last modified: January 30th, 2023 by ABBStaff-Mayowa
0
Facebook Twitter Google + Pinterest
atoluwashe@gmail.com'
ABBStaff-Mayowa

previous post
Original Wednesday Addams actress, Lisa Loring, dead at 64
next post
Zelensky says Ukraine would boycott the Olympics if Russia is allowed to compete

You may also like

Ukraine shoots down own drone over central...

Uttarakhand tunnel collapse: Rescuers race to save...

Failed Republican candidate arrested on suspicion of...

A search warrant was authorized to access...

Pakistan: More than 50 killed and dozens...

Johannesburg fire ‘wake-up call’, President Ramaphosa says

77-year-old woman rescued from rubble 9 days...

Court decriminalizes abortion across Mexico

At least 44 were killed in Pakistan...

Nigerian woman arrested in Libya for alleged...

Leave a Comment

Keep in touch

Facebook Twitter Google + Instagram Pinterest Linkedin Youtube Email RSS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google +
  • Instagram
  • Pinterest
  • Linkedin
  • Youtube
  • Email
  • RSS
Footer Logo
  • Home
  • About Me
  • Contact Me
  • Advertise On This Blog
  • Share Your Stories
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use

©2023 - Aderonke Bamidele's Blog. All Rights Reserved. Designed and Developed by ABB


Back To Top